“
The evidence
What I will not claim about this device
There is a percentage that circulates on microcurrent pages across the internet, including on older pages of my own. It appears as 88.5. Elsewhere it appears as 88.25, as 82.5, as 80.25, as 90.4, as 91.7. Same 1980s Russian trials. Different decimal point depending on which page you happen to land on.
I am not going to hand you a number I cannot stand behind, and I am removing it from my own properties as I find it. If a figure cannot survive being checked, it should not be doing sales work.
What actually exists
The 1980s Russian clinical reports exist. They describe a treatment complex assessed across large patient groups by practitioners at varying levels of experience. They are not randomised controlled trials as a regulator would define one today, and anyone presenting them as such is overstating the case.
I keep the summary archive online so you can read it and reach your own conclusion rather than take mine. Read the 1980s SCENAR clinical studies summary.
What I will say
The device does what the specifications say it does. Forty eight electrodes, five frequency sequences, bipolar pulses that adapt to skin impedance. Those are engineering facts and they are checkable against the manual.
Everything beyond that is my professional read after applying this technology since 2002, and I will label it as exactly that rather than dress it up as a clinical finding. This device is not a treatment for any medical condition, it is not a substitute for your physician, and results differ from person to person.
If the missing percentage costs me the sale, so be it. I would rather lose the order than inherit somebody else's decimal point.